I am curious to know why some of our medical directives are systolic driven rather than mean arterial pressure driven? Current research suggests MAP is more accurate than SBP in non-invasive monitoring and better reflects perfusion pressure in shock, is a better indicator of organ perfusion and is a better predictor of post-cardiac arrest outcomes. Even ACLS recommends a target MAP of 65mmHg for post-cardiac arrest care as opposed to a certain SBP. Is this a change that OBHG would consider in future iterations of the medical directives?

In keeping with the Covid-19 Cardiac Arrest algorithms can Midaz procedural sedation be applied to SGA similar to how it is used for ETT maintenance post ROSC should the pt increase gcs during the ROSC?