Hi MAC, hope you folks are well. I was curious if you can provide clarification and potentially rational to the “Mandatory Patch Point” for Medical Cardiac Arrests. Although I understand calling for termination or potentially further direction, I am curious if we have to BHP patch if the attending Paramedic feels the Pt in cardiac arrest [that fits criteria for TOR] would benefit from transportation for any variety of situations (age, geo. location, ect.). It seems it would be counter-intuitive to spend the time calling an MD to tell them we feel transport would be beneficial for a Pt (especially if ready to transport) instead of initiating time critical transport + our active resuscitation efforts. Would a BHP ever say no, do not transport this Pt, regardless of potential ED Tx benefit? I recognize this is an odd question that is a rarity, but I’ve found myself in this position more than once and am wondering how to efficiently tackle these situations in the future without a potential protocol violation. Cheers MAC.

I am looking for clarification on whether or not pre-arrival shocks count towards consideration of a medical TOR with the new 20 minute protocol. I have reviewed the companion document and note it does state, “As a general rule, Paramedics do NOT count pre-arrival interventions in their patient care. Care delivered prior to arrival can be “considered” and documented.” I also found a previous Ask Mac response from Dec 22 2017 asking the same question, however the answer was at the time of the previous Medical Cardiac Arrest Directive (4 analyses only). In Mac’s response at that time they did state, “SWORBHP Medical Council believes that ANY defibrillation delivered to a patient during a cardiac arrest resuscitation should be counted and considered as a contraindication to the application of the TOR.” Looking for clarity between these statements and the new protocol. Thanks for the information!