Date Published

May 21, 2020

Updated For

ALS PCS Version ALS PCS Version 5.2


Hello, Bit of a long winded question so please bear with me. The contraindication for topical lidocaine in ETI of the unresponsive patient: would it be reasonable to administer topical lidocaine to the unresponsive patient IF required to intubate because of the inability to adequately oxygenate and ventilate (after exhausting all BLS measures) when the patient is showing signs of rising ICP. I appreciate the dangers of intubation in a patient that has rising ICP €“ increasing sympathetic activity, periods of not oxygenating even if not adequate, and ultimately worsening ICP. In the setting of acute brain injury, hypoxia, hypercapnia and hypotension (one episode of each in most of the literature €“ less then 90% or <90mmHg) has show to worsen morbidity and mortality via secondary brain injury. I have read on several websites (life in the fast lane) and a few journal articles that topical (not IV) lidocaine can blunt the cardiovascular affects of intubation. Would it then be a good idea to apply topical lidocaine to these unconscious patients in the event that ETI is deemed the only appropriate means of oxygenating and ventilating a patient with TBI and ICP? Again, I will reiterate that I mean ETI in these patients as a desperate means of oxygenating and ventilating, not routinely. References: Williams AM, Ling G, Alam HB. Damage Control Resuscitation for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. InDamage Control Resuscitation 2020 (pp. 277-302). Springer, Cham. Manley G, Knudson MM, Morabito D, Damron S, Erickson V, Pitts L. Hypotension, hypoxia, and head injury: frequency, duration, and consequences. Archives of Surgery. 2001 Oct 1;136(10):1118-23. ODRIGUES, F., KOSOUR, C., FIGUEIREDO, L., MOREIRA, M., GASPAROTTO, A., DRAGOSAVAC, D., TUAN, B., MORIEL, P., MARTINS, L., FALCAO, A.. Which is Safer to Avoid an Increase in ICP After Endotracheal Suctioning in Severe Head Injury: Intravenous or Endotracheal Lidocaine?. Journal of Neurology Research, North America, 3, may. 2013. Available at: . Date accessed: 05 Mar. 2020.


We love receiving such thoughtful questions. You are correct that in patients with traumatic brain injury that secondary insults (including the deadly duo of hypoxia and hypotension) need to be minimized in order to prevent worsening brain injury. In these patients, when possible, methods to reduce rising ICP should be considered. Intravenous Lidocaine may be used in conjunction with a rapid sequence intubation with sedation and paralytics to help reduce the reflexive hypertensive response that can occur with laryngoscopy, thus reducing the risks associated with iatrogenic increases in ICP.

However, using topical Lidocaine for intubation in the prehospital setting is not recommended.

The Contraindication of Unresponsive patient is in place to prevent topical Lidocaine from causing aspiration. If a patient is so obtunded that they require intubation for their traumatic head injury, they are at increased risk of this aspiration and worsening hypoxia. The OBHG Companion Document goes on to clarify that Lidocaine spray is indicated for awake intubations only.

If this patient is requiring intubation for airway protection following a traumatic brain injury, they most definitely need expedient transport to definitive care. If they also require intubation, it should be performed as expediently as possible, with no delays for the topical Lidocaine to work prior to intubation.

Again, remember due to the reflexive hypertensive response, these intubations should be a last resort in the prehospital setting when other airway management fails.




Additional Resources

No additional resources are available for this SWORBHP Tip.